Punta Arenas February 24, 2011
LORD
MEDIA EDITOR AND PUBLIC
DUFUSION
THIS
We extend to his respectable Medium ---
LEFT WORLD AND THE REGIME OF Khaddafi.
The truth is that I think the world left (with a few exceptions) is waiting far too long to do their analysis (with their own brains) on what actually happens in Libya and so far most assume an attitude of "get the Swedish "and avoid the hot topics and draw on some analysis of some n VIP leftist policy that will help us in this fateful moment like the priest who comes to God to find answers to the inexplicable.
This should happen by the fact that there are still many who think that Khaddafi is a revolutionary leader and insist on believing that Libya is an Arab socialist paradise ... and so, but openly defended at least leave the nebula doubt or who or who would be behind the popular rebellions and give it time to finally learn the not very near what woven in this North African tragedy ... this attitude contrasts with the position taken by us a few weeks ago, leftists of the world, when popular revolts in Tunisia and Egypt.
The first and that can help tremendously in this task of knowing which side of the trichera is Khaddafi as sui generis and green revolution (and other experiences of "socialism") is that you have to wonder where are in that society "socialist khaddafiana" communists, socialists and any organization with revolutionary dye? ... reality hits us in the face: surprise, surprise, or prohibited like the organic brand of militant Islam, or dead or in exile ... or whether we find the same reality of regimes supposedly ideologically opposed to the government of Libya, Egypt's Mubarak, Ben Ali's Tunisia, Iran's Ayatollahs ... why is this contradiction? History
seems simple and familiar and no less tragic, which may be initially an anti-imperialist and anticolonial revolution and a socialist society where the people exercised power through the popular "revolutionary committee" as secured at the famous Green Book written by the very Kaddafi (version Arabic Bible Red Mao?), ended up being a simple dynasty where nepotism and cronyism swept the facts with popular and participatory democracy in addition to jettisoning the truly revolutionary intentions ... this reminds me of Stalin and the countries of real socialism. In the specific facts rather than a revolutionary society as Libya is more like a Shakespearean tragedy (I recommend reading and comparing Macbeth, King Lear, Hamlet), similarities are also usable with other systems ... what evidence was the English playwright and remains more credible, reliable and accurate than many "political scientists" contemporary.
of former revolutionary oil partner.
It is no secret that Kaddafi and company ceased to be revolutionary or something similar when partnered (partnered) for quite some time with oil imperialism to maintain himself and his family in power, to avoid a similar fate to that of Saddam Hussein ...
How is it possible that the former anti-imperialist revolutionary and ended up being a spoiled baby and effective partner in 1986 who killed his daughter for three years when NATO bombed Libya in order of Reagan?
What made the old "devil" became in the eyes of the imperialists and capitalists in a "good guy" a little mischievous, stubborn and a half clown, but boy good for their interests at all?
is it that the stronghold of the Palestinian cause was over Palestinian refugees expelled from Libya?
... outbursts own Libyan Bedouin chieftain or political pragmatism (opportunism)?
Possibly the answer to these questions we find that Libya has a lot of oil and natural gas conditioning and open the appetites of both their rulers and world capitalism. This makes very different from Libya to Tunisia and Egypt even perish .... oddly, these two countries are only small parts in big oil business that badly needs European and U.S. consumers and carriers are just gold Libya .. black instead, like Iran, Venezuela and Saudi Arabia is a major producer (1,700,000 barrels per day of which the U.S. consumes 20%, Italy 35% and all the European Union 15%).
Knowing the importance of being a producer and the Yankees prefer a extrambótico leguaráz and Rulers before a radical Muslim regime that would supply trouble U.S. oil, is that Kaddafi "change its discourse and action" in the 90's and begins to gain trust, probably only temporary, and imperialists of the Yankees giving them participation in the exploration, exploitation and oil profits. Attention to this fact: Chevron, Statoil, Shell, BP, Repsol ... are just some of the most closely linked to oil capitalist imperialism that are installed in Libya ... former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, he Tere instructed to secure the oil business with Khaddafi in exchange for not bothering little matter more, in honor of the economic gains in store this new society was best forgotten ... for now.
is it that with all that gain product of large-scale export of oil and natural gas severance between young Libyans is more than 25 %?... what happens to that wealth, where the welfare society?. What we are sure of is that both Khaddafi dynasty and the economics of the Bush clan, Condoleeza Rice, Rumfeld and others are lining their pockets with oil dollars belonging to the Libyan people.
fundamental part of Bush anti-terror policy
... Y Khaddafi collaboration with big business was further and further, provided that the Yankees consider him a viable partner and forgive their antics and anti-imperialist speeches of yesteryear, did not hesitate to lend the preparation of false evidence of weapons of mass destruction that Iraq supposedly was what justified the U.S. invasion of 2003 and the global implementation by the Bush administration policy on terrorism ... how many millions of leftists demonstrated against the invasion on the streets of the world?
Even as good Arab nationalist, beyond being very unfriendly to allow movements and leftist parties in Libya, allied and supported in the 80's nothing less than the thugs of the sinister and sadly remembered the fascist Argentine Triple A López Rega that torture has handbook , murder and deasparición of many leftists in Argentina.
And a fact even more tasty ... the best European ally Khaddafi is nicely weighted never Silvio Berlusconi! ... Of course, Italy is dependent on Libyan oil and gas (or helps the family Khaddsafi we say? ) as well as the Libyan dictator has a mansion near the summer home of libidinous Italian Prime Minister ... well The owners are almost Khaddafi Italian football club Juventus, apart from its shares in the automaker italics ... we?
Here goes ... and surely this part demonstrates the cynicism (as he says Fidel) of the European Union and the United States ...
Business is business
Provided stem the tide of impoverished migrants from Africa, the EU has Khaddafi cancels billions of euros a year for his government as a sort of sieve or customs of these desperate Africans trying to reach Europe all costs ... and the Libyan customs policies apply concentration camps or sunken boats that dare to sail to Italy .... so now that the EU explains the day yesterday was more concerned about the potential tsunami of immigrants who arrive from Libya if it destabilizes the internal situation in that country North African (either by coup, civil war or military intervention by NATO) that the human rights situation of the Libyan and African refugees ... Europe with this little business ensures that arrive on their shores and unwanted guests Libyan oil and gas continues to be pumped throughout the old continent ... Khaddafi meanwhile it knows that the Europeans have caught a certain part because if you push or help to destabilize the oil runs out and drop to the mass of African immigrants remains virtually imprisoned in their country ... the business of fear and cynicism.
Moreover, because Obama has taken so long to push his partner Khaddafi? Apart from the usual babble ... "is unacceptable bloodshed and repression of the people protesting in Libya" ... nothing else.
With insurance, known as we know it is very possible that the CIA may be behind some of the demonstrations against Khaddafi (if you overthrow, U.S. should not split the oil profits with such unwanted partner) but it is also very possible that most of the protesters obey the tribes were divided by Khaddafi ningueneadas and when it came to power ... it is still striking that the revolutionary assemblies arising from the protests in Benghazi and Tobruk work in the mosques of those cities ... with the Yankees that you drop the hair at the thought of a revolt are more pro-Iranian Shiite style to a "rebellious" pro-Yankee and this makes the CIA and Obama hesitant to make judgments of conviction against Khaddafi, since apparently not clear who is "their man" Libya and do not want to lose their share of the oil business.
Why Khaddafi changed his address within 24 hours?
Khaddafi changed his accusations about the possible blame for their misfortunes. At first Khaddafi and his son (the clumsy Saif al-Islam ... which means Sword of Islam) said they rejected any intervention abroad to destabilize the Libyan state ... perhaps related to unreliable oil partner U.S. and NATO?
After (Tuesday), Khaddafi were actually reported that Osama Bin Laden and al-Quaeeda those who were behind the coup which sought, probably the same as the theological dictatorship of Iran, Libya to drag a Muslim extremist dictatorship, which would represent a nightmare for the U.S. and West. Apparently this tactic seeks to neutralize a more landing of the Yankees and win the support of the West ... make it?
Moreover Khaddafi continues to threaten with more repression and accused of "dogs drogadistas" the protesters in the streets and "bloody hell" to the international media ... (Pinochet used at the time more or about the same terminology), and even Khaddafi called on his followers to Libya clean the "scum (the protesters) from house to house", implanted with it a cruel and bloody witch hunt (more similarities: Pinochet called to remove the cancer when the Marxist coup) .... I wonder if you can, when Khaddafi argues in this way, described as leader of the Libyan Revolution to this ruler as described by some media placed in rows on the left? What will think many times re-elected in fair elections and informed President Hugo Chavez or the parsimony and very focused Evo Morales, when the British government, very cynically sinister links to this rampant and dangerous character Libya governs the style of Mussolini?
shows created: use common sense or the dialectic ... which is the same
We facilitate the matter, without much ideologism paralyzing and navel-gazing ... to conclude whether a society is basic popular , alternative, humanistic, revolutionary, anti-imperialist and heads of some form of socialism I believe we must take into account some key factors:
How is the real participation of people in the mechanisms and structures of power, either through popular assemblies, revolutionary committees, popular parliaments, etc ... exercise or a kind of popular and participatory democracy, they socialize the rights and duties of citizens, or only those "above" has the truth and the last word?
practice is truly a capitalist economy or at least seeks to implement a humanitarian, non-predatory economy of humans and nature ... and profits are usufruct of all or stay in the pockets and bank accounts of the slaughter and enlightened leaders and their families ... invested in the welfare of all, in health, education, housing, work, leisure, etc?
all ethnicities and cultures and citizens are respected and have their rights equally and ideas are fought with ideas, not bullets? Everyone has the right to organize and participate?
are repeated all religious beliefs and sexual preferences?
economy is planned to respect and preserve the environment? Surely
missing many topics to measure whether a company is truly humanist and socialist, even many say I'm crazy, I reply as John Lennon "You say I'ma dreamer ... but I'm not the only"
I think that based on these minimum requirements could not qualify not nearly as socialist and participatory to regimen Khaddafi China nor the People ... please!
What happens in Libya with the popular allegedly socialist regime of Muhammad the Khaddafi as to what happened at the time in real socialism, what is happening in China and North Korea should not pass unnoticed to the left world, we can not implement the policy of the ostrich or the sinister policy of "enemy of my enemy is my friend" ... or that the stability and safety of this "paradise" is more important than the life of a few troublemakers ... those attitudes no are nothing revolutionary but a lot of Machiavellian and reactionary.
My intension is not to pontificate on anything, even I can be wrong in some of my findings, many of which are based on long readings and observation as a news or news analysis as TeleSurTv, Rebelion.org, Diariourgencia SUMMARY LATIN AMERICAN Cubadebate, Page 12, Reflections of Fidel, Alyaseera, Gara, Kaos en la Red, Le Monde Diplomatique, La Jornada and endless digital newspapers anarchists, communists, Trotskyites, socialists, to the most reactionary, etc. but, as a political animal and animal social rejects anything that smacks of imperialism and capitalism and I know firsthand of imperialist action in Chile, including detained-disappeared father, I assume I need to understand, analyze and discuss, I urge for an answer and ultimately argue with myself, if only that what you achieve with all this attempt to seek answers ... do not know why the line I find more and more suspiciously reactionary.
NATO might ends thus invade Libya and Colonel charge Bedouin old scores ever dreamed of a Libyan maybe more like Italy under Mussolini that Fidel's Cuba, even a U.S. military action in Libya would put an end to a perceived threat of a pro-Iranian regime in the region, thereby making sure the state of U.S. warmongering, oil and gas reserves and past Libyan military intervention would be a scene that could remove finally an oil partner so hated by global capitalism, but it was necessary at the time. It can be safely in the Libyan case, much of the international press as they do intentionally misinformed, it is no secret that many international media are part of global capitalism and are notoriously unreliable, giving a deathblow to the truth to which we must add the fact that Libya is no news that is not dominated by the family Khaddafi ... all that can happen in the next few hours ... but we can not expect to happen or that to try to analyze it now rather than once it's all past. We venture, we run the risk of being wrong until ... is the best that we inherited the fall of real socialism ... dare to seek information, discuss, and practice and not wait for the completion of the saints popes written for new reading reality through the eyes of others.
This practice of testing should be inherent in being a socialist, well that is much needed since it is becoming more and more imperative for people to rethink leftist culture with their own heads, the kind of society we want and why we still struggle and to re-enchant and delight for this just cause more and more young people who have been educated by the system errors and horrors of "socialism" real and Stalinists. Faced with this situation is to rebel, strike our analysis and revolutionary practice.
Posted by - Ilich Galdámez, son of detained-disappeared
is also recommended to read this article -
El Diablo cross selling. The history of Muammar Gaddafi
http://www.radiotierra.com/-
Received and returned by.
Express Solidarity Association and Torture of Magellan
Only click one of Nik and see
Blog wwwagrupacionsolidariaexppmaga http:// llanes.blogspot.com /
http://my.opera.com/ LUISTAPIARUIS / blog /
http://www.wallinside.com/ login-http INFODDHHENCHILE.html
: / / informador1954.obolog. com /
http://noticiasdeddhhenchile. blogspot.com /
http://informanoticiero. globered.com /
0 comments:
Post a Comment