WFTU condemned military aggression imperialists against Libya: Athens, March 20, 2011
This competition leads to economic warfare and espionage or as the case today to the military in Libya. The EU, U.S., France, Britain and their allies argue attacking Libya to implement the decisions of the UN.
is lies and are hypocrites. Why not do the same thing apply to the dozens of UN resolutions on Palestine, why not do the same to implement United Nations resolutions on Cyprus, why not do the same for implement resolutions of the United Nations the cessation of the embargo against Cuba, and so on.?
We demand the immediate cessation of military attacks against Libya. We express our international solidarity with the people of Libya: View
<>
LORD TO PROTECT CHILDREN Libya!
For Siboney King (poet Venezuela)
The image of that child, alone, orphaned, among the ruins ...
is so shameful disgrace of the empire,
mercilessly attacking so many people.
The rule is the devil who travels the world with hatred and rage,
over all the wealth that produce many homelands.
The devil sows hatred, horror, misieria and crying.
The devil destroys the love, peace, laughter and song.
While there is the evil empire and depraved,
never see the smile of a child
who dreams of a just and humane world.
A child that survives in ruins .... Protect
Holy God! Libyan
A child may not wrest the tenderness of his lips
not dream of being a citizen,
to defend the homeland of all his brothers. Lord Protect
Libyan children, the demon lurking
without being alive!
Caracas, March 20, 2011
<> <>
Indian Communist Party condemns attack on Libya
New Delhi, March 20 (PL): The Communist Party India (Marxist) (CPI (M) has condemned the bombings perpetrated by the NATO against Libya, and called to protest against the North African country's military aggression.
Despite the rhetoric that is to protect the Libyan people is a flagrant violation of Libya's sovereignty and intervention are well calculated to cause a change in government, said the Politburo of the CPI (M) in a press release issued on Sunday.
He claims
the double standards applied by the Western powers at the time to react to the protests taking place in the Arab world.
In his opinion, the hypocrisy of Western powers is evident in its collusion with the Saudi military intervention to crush peaceful protests in Bahrain, while having no qualms about using force to defend their interests in an oil producing country as Libya.
Recalling that the first day of bombing against North African country since 48 people died, the CPI (M) warns that Organization North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is repeating what it did in Iraq, where it caused million dead, and left a trail of destruction.
According to the Indian community, the Security Council United Nations, which authorized the use of force against the government of Muammar Gadaffi, was used by NATO to carry out the attack against Libya.
The five Security Council members that abstained in the vote, including India, should demand an immediate revision of the resolution, urged the CPI (M).
<> <> <>
Dangers of 'humanitarian intervention' in Libya
By Robert Fisk So we
take all necessary measures to protect civilians Libyans, right? Too bad we were not occurred 42 years ago. Or 41 years. Or ... well, you know the rest. And do not be fooled about what it really means the Security Council resolution. Once again, be the change of regime. And as in Iraq, to \u200b\u200buse one of the only memorable phrase Tom Friedman at the time, "when the late dictator is gone, who knows what kind of bats come out of the box?
And after Tunisia and Egypt, had to be Libya, right? The North African Arab demand freedom, democracy, no more oppression. Yes, that's what we have in common. But another thing that those nations have in common is that we we in the West, who feed their dictatorships decade after decade. The French huddled Ben Ali Mubarak Snuggle Americans and Italians to Kadafi clothed until our glorious leader was to rise from the political dead. Would
why, I wonder, that we had not heard of Lord Blair of Esfahan recently? Without a doubt should have been there, clapping with glee at a new humanitarian intervention. Maybe just taking a break between innings. Or perhaps, like the dragons in The Faerie Queene, Spenser, is vomiting in silence Catholic pamphlets with all the enthusiasm of a Kadafi in full swing.
Let's open the curtain just a little and look at the darkness behind. Yes, Kadafi is an absolute lunatic, a lunatic level Ahmadinejad of Iran or Israel's Lieberman, who once, incidentally, started bragging that Mubarak could go to hell, but he trembled with fear when Mubarak was actually released in that direction. And there is a racist element in this.
Middle East seems to produce these characters ... as opposed to Europe, which in the last 100 years has produced only Berlusconi, Mussolini, Stalin and the little guy who was a corporal in the infantry regiment Bavarian reserve of 16 flat and he lost his senses when he was elected chancellor in 1933 ... but now we're going to cleanse the Middle East and we forget our own past colonial in the sandbox. And why not, when people said Gaddafi in Benghazi, "we will Zenga, Zeng (alley by alley), house by house, room by room." It is certainly a humanitarian intervention really, veritas is a good idea. After all, there is no ground troops.
course, if this revolution was suppressed with violence in, say, Mauritania, I do not it requires, no-fly zones. Neither Ivory Coast, an afterthought. Or any other place in Africa that had no deposits of oil, gas or minerals or unimportant in our protection of Israel, which is the real reason that Egypt we care so much.
enumerate some things that could go wrong, let's look askance at those bats that nest in the glowing still and humid inside the box. Suppose that clings Kadafi in Tripoli and the British, French and Americans destroy their planes, flying from its airports, its battery assault armored vehicles and missiles and he just does not disappear. On Thursday I watched just before the UN vote, the Pentagon began to enlighten the reporters about the dangers of the whole operation, adding that it could take days to install an air exclusion zone.
Then there is the truculence and villainy Gaddafi himself. We saw on Friday, when his foreign minister announced a ceasefire and an end to all military lasoperaciones, knowing full well, of course, that a NATO force committed to regime change would not accept and allow that occur Kadafi as an Arab leader to peace-loving victim of Western aggression: Omar Mukhtar lives again.
How about if we simply no time, if tanks are moving Kadafi? Then send mercenaries to help losrebeldes. "We settled temporarily in Benghazi, with directors, NGOs and the diplomatic wording used? Notice how, at this critical time, let alone taking the tribes of Libya, that we invoke seasoned warrior people with enthusiasm for a couple of weeks. Now we talk about the need to protect alpueblo of Libya, and without registering Senoussi, the most powerful group of tribal families in Benghazi, whose men have been spared much of the fighting. King Idris was overthrown by Kadafi in 1969, was Senoussi. The rebel flag red, white and green-the old pre-revolutionary flag of Libya, is in fact Idris flag, a flag Senoussi.
Now suppose that the rebels arrive in Tripoli (the key point of the whole exercise, is not it?): Welcome there? Yes, there were protests in the capital, but many of those brave protesters came from Benghazi. What will the supporters of Qaddafi? "Sedisgregarán? Will they suddenly realized that Kadafi always hated each other and join the revolution? Or continue the civil war?
And if the rebels come to Tripoli and decide that Gaddafi and his demented son Saif al-Islam should receive their deserved along with his thugs? Will we close our eyes to the massacres of retaliation, a public hanging, to treatment as criminals who have inflicted Kadafi for so many years? I wonder. Libya is not Egypt. Again, Kadafi is a crackpot and, given his strange performance with its Green Paper on the balcony of his house bombed, it is likely that from time to time also gets angry.
is also the danger of things going wrong on our side: the bombs falling on civilians, the NATO aircraft that can be shot down or crashed in the territory of Kadafi, the sudden suspicion among losrebeldes / the Libyan people / the democracy demonstrators that aid the West has, after all, ulterior motives. And then there's a boring universal rule in all this: in the second when weapons are used against another government, for good reason you have, things start to break loose. After all, the same rebels on Thursday morning expressed its outrage at the indifference of Paris waving French flags on the night of that day in Benghazi. Viva America! Until ...
know the old arguments. However bad it has been our past behavior, what should we do now? It's a little late to ask that. We loved when Gaddafi came to power in 1969 and then, when shown to be a lunatic, we hate, then love him again, I speak of when Lord Blair shook hands and now we hate it again. Did Arafat did not have a similar history of ups and downs for the Israelis and Americans? First was a super-terrorist who longed to destroy Israel, then a superestadista who shook hands with Yitzhak Rabin, and then again became a super terrorist when he realized that he had been misled about the future of Palestine.
thing we can do is locate the Qaddafi and Saddam's future that we nurture today, future demented sadistic torture chamber they cultivate their young vampires with our financial assistance. In Uzbekistan for example. In Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Chechnya and the like. Men who have to deal with, which will sell us oil, we buy weapons and keep at bay the Muslim terrorists.
Everything is so well known that annoys. And now we're back at it, punching on the desktop in spiritual unity. We have many options unless you want to watch another Srebrenica, right? But wait: did not happen that long after we imposed our no-fly zone in Bosnia?
<> <> <>
protests outside the French embassy in Caracas
By Miguel Angel Navy Latorre:
World Press YVKE - Aporrea
A group of young revolutionaries gathered this Saturday on the outskirts of the French Embassy in Venezuela to protest military action initiated the European nation, allied with the United States and Britain, against the people of Libya.
Jhonalbert Viera, participating in the protest rejected imperialist world powers continue to use military action against sovereign nations to steal their natural resources.
"This protest is against the French Government unilaterally arbitrarily decided to create these attacks against Libya. It was they who started this aggression against the Libyan people, not against Muammar Al Gaddafi. In fact, already begun to excuse failure of navigation and the missiles are coming to civilian buildings. The truth is the same as happened with Iraq, "said Viera.
These young people announced in the coming days take other actions to protest against the invading foreign powers that have been initiated with the support of the Security Council of UN, Libya. Notably
French military aircraft began this Saturday, the invasion of Libya and destroyed four tanks war of the armed forces loyal to Muammar Al Gaddafi.
Meanwhile, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) forces deployed to Libya, with aircraft, ships and submarines supplied by France, Spain, United States, Canada, Britain and Denmark, while Italy announced its military bases are available to the military alliance. ____
Index: Aesthetics and vital vacant / historical legends and stories coloraos / Of Teth / "Teth turned 33 ': Carlos López Dzur. / In THE LIBREPESADOR / Cucumber Mayors / Cucumber Mayors / book on behalf of His Names Segade Standard / A Trial / procrastinator / Books and Literature / Carlos López Dzur: The press sold and anesthetized / Poetic Aletheia Research Center / Graciela Maturo
0 comments:
Post a Comment